Employment of Multiple Algorithms for Optimal Path-based Test Selection Strategy

TL;DR

This paper introduces a path-based strategy that combines multiple algorithms to generate and select optimal test sequences for software testing, considering various coverage and prioritization criteria.

Contribution

It proposes a novel multi-algorithm approach for optimal test selection that adapts to different problem instances and criteria, improving test effectiveness.

Findings

Different algorithms yield optimal results for different models.

Test set optimality varies with coverage level and prioritization.

The strategy is validated through experiments on 50 system models.

Abstract

Executing various sequences of system functions in a system under test represents one of the primary techniques in software testing. The natural way to create effective, consistent and efficient test sequences is to model the system under test and employ an algorithm to generate the tests that satisfy a defined test coverage criterion. Several criteria of test set optimality can be defined. In addition, to optimize the test set from an economic viewpoint, the priorities of the various parts of the system model under test must be defined. Using this prioritization, the test cases exercise the high priority parts of the system under test more intensely than those with low priority. Evidence from the literature and our observations confirm that finding a universal algorithm that produces an optimal test set for all test coverage and test set optimality criteria is a challenging task. Moreover, for different individual problem instances, different algorithms provide optimal results. In this paper, we present a path-based strategy to perform optimal test selection. The strategy first employs a set of current algorithms to generate test sets; then, it assesses the optimality of each test set by the selected criteria, and finally, chooses the optimal test set. The experimental results confirm the validity and usefulness of this strategy. For individual instances of 50 system under test models, different algorithms provided optimal results; these results varied by the required test coverage level, the size of the priority parts of the model, and the selected test set optimality criteria.