Comparative study of finite element methods using the Time-Accuracy-Size (TAS) spectrum analysis
Justin Chang, Maurice S. Fabien, Matthew G. Knepley, Richard T. Mills

TL;DR
This paper introduces a comprehensive performance analysis framework for comparing finite element algorithms based on time, accuracy, and size, aiding optimal algorithm selection for PDE simulations.
Contribution
It extends the TAS spectrum model to include hardware and algorithmic tradeoffs, providing a new method for evaluating finite element discretizations.
Findings
The TAS spectrum analysis effectively compares different finite element methods.
Application to Poisson's equation demonstrates the framework's practical utility.
Insights into hardware and algorithmic tradeoffs in finite element simulations.
Abstract
We present a performance analysis appropriate for comparing algorithms using different numerical discretizations. By taking into account the total time-to-solution, numerical accuracy with respect to an error norm, and the computation rate, a cost-benefit analysis can be performed to determine which algorithm and discretization are particularly suited for an application. This work extends the performance spectrum model in Chang et. al. 2017 for interpretation of hardware and algorithmic tradeoffs in numerical PDE simulation. As a proof-of-concept, popular finite element software packages are used to illustrate this analysis for Poisson's equation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Model Reduction and Neural Networks
