Radiative transfer calculations of the diffuse ionised gas in disc galaxies with cosmic ray feedback
Bert Vandenbroucke (1), Kenneth Wood (1), Philipp Girichidis (2), Alex, Hill (3,4,5), Thomas Peters (6) ((1) University of St Andrews, (2), Leibniz-Institut f\"ur Asdtrophysic Potsdam, (3) University of British, Columbia, (4) Space Science Institute

TL;DR
This study uses Monte Carlo radiation transfer on cosmic ray feedback simulations to better model the vertical structure and emission lines of diffuse ionised gas in disc galaxies, aligning models more closely with observations.
Contribution
It demonstrates that cosmic ray feedback leads to more realistic DIG scale heights and highlights the need for additional heating mechanisms to reproduce observed emission line intensities.
Findings
Cosmic ray feedback increases DIG scale heights to match observations.
Fiducial cosmic ray heating alone cannot reproduce observed emission line intensities.
Adjusting ionising source luminosity and spectrum improves line emission modeling.
Abstract
The large vertical scale heights of the diffuse ionised gas (DIG) in disc galaxies are challenging to model, as hydrodynamical models including only thermal feedback seem to be unable to support gas at these heights. In this paper, we use a three dimensional Monte Carlo radiation transfer code to post-process disc simulations of the Simulating the Life-Cycle of Molecular Clouds (SILCC) project that include feedback by cosmic rays. We show that the more extended discs in simulations including cosmic ray feedback naturally lead to larger scale heights for the DIG which are more in line with observed scale heights. We also show that including a fiducial cosmic ray heating term in our model can help to increase the temperature as a function of disc scale height, but fails to reproduce observed DIG nitrogen and sulphur forbidden line intensities. We show that, to reproduce these line…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
