Performance Comparison of two novel Relay-Assisted Hybrid FSO / RF Communication Systems

TL;DR

This paper compares two novel relay-assisted hybrid FSO/RF multi-hop communication systems, analyzing their outage probability and BER, and finds that selecting signals at each hop improves performance but increases complexity and power consumption.

Contribution

First to analyze and derive closed-form expressions for outage probability and BER of multi-hop hybrid FSO/RF systems with different selection protocols.

Findings

Selection at each hop yields better performance than last hop selection.

Last hop selection consumes about twice the power for the same outage probability.

Both structures are suitable for long-range communications, with trade-offs in complexity and power.

Abstract

In this manuscript, two novel multi-hop relay-assisted hybrid Free Space Optical / Radio Frequency (FSO / RF) communication systems are presented and compared. In these structures, RF and FSO links, at each hop, are parallel and send data simultaneously. This is the first time that in a multihop hybrid FSO / RF structure, Detect and Forward protocol is used. In the first structure, at each hop, received signals with higher Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) is selected. But in the second structure, at each hop, received FSO and RF signals are separately detected and forwarded and selection is done only at the last hop. Considering FSO link in Negative Exponential atmospheric turbulence and RF link in Rayleigh fading, for the first time, closed-form expressions are derived for Outage Probability (P_out) and Bit Error Rate (BER) of the proposed structures. MATLAB simulations are provided to verify derived expressions. The main motivation of this work is to answer this question that how much is the difference of selection at each hop and selection at the last hop. Results indicate that the structure with selection at each hop has better performance than the structure with selection at the last hop. At different target Outage Probability, selection at the last hop consumes about two times (~3dB) more power than selection at each hop. Both structures are particularly suitable for long-range communications. However, selection at each hop, in the cost of more complexity, is recommended for applications which have problem with supplying the required power for communication.