Maximum value of the standardized log of odds ratio and celestial mechanics
Olga A. Vsevolozhskaya, Gabriel Ruiz, Dmitri V. Zaykin

TL;DR
This paper reveals that the standardized log of odds ratio is bounded by the Laplace Limit Constant, linking statistical effect size limits to celestial mechanics and impacting epidemiological analysis.
Contribution
It establishes the maximum value of the standardized log odds ratio as the Laplace Limit Constant, connecting statistical bounds to celestial mechanics equations.
Findings
Maximum standardized ln(OR) is approximately 0.6627.
Standardized ln(OR) reaches its maximum at ln(OR)~4.7987.
Implications for prior distributions in epidemiological studies.
Abstract
The odds ratio (OR) is a widely used measure of the effect size in observational research. ORs reflect statistical association between a binary outcome, such as the presence of a health condition, and a binary predictor, such as an exposure to a pollutant. Statistical significance and interval estimates are often computed for the logarithm of OR, ln(OR), and depend on the asymptotic standard error of ln(OR). For a sample of size N, the standard error can be written as a ratio of sigma over square root of N, where sigma is the population standard deviation of ln(OR). The ratio of ln(OR) over sigma is a standardized effect size. Unlike correlation, that is another familiar standardized statistic, the standardized ln(OR) cannot reach values of minus one or one. We find that its maximum possible value is given by the Laplace Limit Constant, (LLC=0.6627...), that appears as a condition in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
