Lepton flavour violation in the MSSM: exact diagonalization vs mass expansion
Andreas Crivellin, Zofia Fabisiewicz, Weronika Materkowska, Ulrich, Nierste, Stefan Pokorski, Janusz Rosiek

TL;DR
This paper compares exact diagonalization and mass expansion methods for calculating lepton flavour violation in the MSSM, providing precise predictions relevant for upcoming experimental tests and updating bounds on flavour-changing parameters.
Contribution
It introduces the Flavour Expansion Theorem for algebraic mass-insertion expansion in MSSM LFV processes and compares it with exact diagonalization, enhancing calculation precision.
Findings
Muon decays impose the strongest bounds on MSSM flavour violation.
Radiative and three-body lepton decays complement each other in constraining parameter space.
Non-holomorphic A-terms significantly affect LFV Higgs decay predictions.
Abstract
The forthcoming precision data on lepton flavour violating decays require precise and efficient calculations in New Physics models. In this article lepton flavour violating processes within the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) are calculated using the method based on the Flavour Expansion Theorem, a recently developed technique performing a purely algebraic mass-insertion expansion of the amplitudes. The expansion in both flavour-violating and flavour-conserving off-diagonal terms of sfermion and supersymmetric fermion mass matrices is considered. In this way the relevant processes are expressed directly in terms of the parameters of the MSSM Lagrangian. We also study the decoupling properties of the amplitudes. The results are compared to the corresponding calculations in the mass eigenbasis (i.e. using the exact diagonalization of the mass matrices). Using these methods,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
