A new foundational crisis in mathematics, is it really happening?
Mirna D\v{z}amonja

TL;DR
The paper argues that the discovery of Homotopy Type Theory (HoTT) does not signify a foundational crisis in mathematics, supporting a pluralist view of mathematical foundations.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of HoTT's mathematical basis and its relation to existing foundations, challenging claims of a crisis.
Findings
HoTT does not undermine existing foundations
The perceived crisis is a misunderstanding
Supports a pluralist approach to foundations
Abstract
The article reconsiders the position of the foundations of mathematics after the discovery of HoTT. Discussion that this discovery has generated in the community of mathematicians, philosophers and computer scientists might indicate a new crisis in the foundation of mathematics. By examining the mathematical facts behind HoTT and their relation with the existing foundations, we conclude that the present crisis is not one. We reiterate a pluralist vision of the foundations of mathematics. The article contains a short survey of the mathematical and historical background needed to understand the main tenets of the foundational issues.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHistory and Theory of Mathematics · Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis · Philosophy and Theoretical Science
