Contextuality and The Single-Qubit Stabilizer Formalism
Piers Lillystone, Joel J. Wallman, Joseph Emerson

TL;DR
This paper reveals that even the simplest quantum systems, like single-qubit stabilizer theory, exhibit generalized contextuality, challenging previous beliefs that such systems are non-contextual and highlighting the complexity of contextuality's role in quantum computation.
Contribution
The study demonstrates that generalized contextuality exists in single-qubit stabilizer theory and clarifies that prepare-and-measure scenarios do not fully capture quantum contextuality.
Findings
Single-qubit stabilizer theory exhibits generalized contextuality.
Contextuality can be confined to transformations within this theory.
Prepare-and-measure scenarios do not fully capture quantum contextuality.
Abstract
Contextuality is a fundamental non-classical property of quantum theory, which has recently been proven to be a key resource for achieving quantum speed-ups in some leading models of quantum computation. However, which of the forms of contextuality, and how much thereof, are required to obtain a speed-up in an arbitrary model of quantum computation remains unclear. In this paper, we show that the relation between contextuality and a compuational advantage is more complicated than previously thought. We achieve this by proving that generalized contextuality is present even within the simplest subset of quantum operations, the so-called single-qubit stabilizer theory, which offers no computational advantage and was previously believed to be completely non-contextual. However, the contextuality of the single-qubit stabilizer theory can be confined to transformations. Therefore our result…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
