Quantitative Constraints on the Reionization History from the IGM Damping Wing Signature in Two Quasars at z > 7
Frederick B. Davies, Joseph F. Hennawi, Eduardo Ba\~nados, Zarija, Luki\'c, Roberto Decarli, Xiaohui Fan, Emanuele P. Farina, Chiara, Mazzucchelli, Hans-Walter Rix, Bram P. Venemans, Fabian Walter, Feige Wang,, Jinyi Yang

TL;DR
This study uses advanced simulations and Bayesian analysis of high-redshift quasar spectra to provide quantitative constraints on the neutral hydrogen fraction during reionization, revealing a significantly neutral universe at z > 7.
Contribution
It introduces a novel combination of simulations and Bayesian methods to jointly constrain the IGM neutral fraction and quasar lifetime from individual spectra.
Findings
Neutral fraction at z=7.09 is approximately 0.48.
Neutral fraction at z=7.54 is approximately 0.60.
Methodology constrains reionization state using two high-redshift quasars.
Abstract
During reionization, neutral hydrogen in the intergalactic medium (IGM) imprints a damping wing absorption feature on the spectrum of high-redshift quasars. A detection of this signature provides compelling evidence for a significantly neutral Universe, and enables measurements of the hydrogen neutral fraction at that epoch. Obtaining reliable quantitative constraints from this technique, however, is challenging due to stochasticity induced by the patchy inside-out topology of reionization, degeneracies with quasar lifetime, and the unknown unabsorbed quasar spectrum close to rest-frame Ly. We combine a large-volume semi-numerical simulation of reionization topology with 1D radiative transfer through high-resolution hydrodynamical simulations of the high-redshift Universe to construct models of quasar transmission spectra during reionization. Our state-of-the-art…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
