Truth Validation with Evidence
Papis Wongchaisuwat, Diego Klabjan

TL;DR
This paper presents a system that validates the truthfulness of statements using knowledge graphs and ontologies, providing supporting evidence for false claims with high accuracy.
Contribution
It introduces a novel inference method combining knowledge graphs and ontologies to verify statements and extract evidence of falseness.
Findings
High accuracy in truth validation
Effective evidence extraction for false statements
Knowledge graph quality impacts system performance
Abstract
In the modern era, abundant information is easily accessible from various sources, however only a few of these sources are reliable as they mostly contain unverified contents. We develop a system to validate the truthfulness of a given statement together with underlying evidence. The proposed system provides supporting evidence when the statement is tagged as false. Our work relies on an inference method on a knowledge graph (KG) to identify the truthfulness of statements. In order to extract the evidence of falseness, the proposed algorithm takes into account combined knowledge from KG and ontologies. The system shows very good results as it provides valid and concise evidence. The quality of KG plays a role in the performance of the inference method which explicitly affects the performance of our evidence-extracting algorithm.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopic Modeling · Software Engineering Research · Advanced Graph Neural Networks
