A comparison of machine learning techniques for taxonomic classification of teeth from the Family Bovidae
Gregory J Matthews, Juliet K. Brophy, Maxwell P. Luetkemeier, Hongie, Gu, George K. Thiruvathukal

TL;DR
This study evaluates various machine learning algorithms for classifying fossil bovid teeth, demonstrating that support vector machines and random forests outperform traditional methods, leading to more accurate taxonomic identification.
Contribution
It compares multiple machine learning techniques for bovid tooth classification, identifying the most effective methods for paleoenvironmental research.
Findings
Support vector machines and random forests outperform other methods.
Machine learning improves accuracy of fossil tooth classification.
Enhanced classification accuracy aids paleoenvironmental reconstructions.
Abstract
This study explores the performance of modern, accurate machine learning algorithms on the classification of fossil teeth in the Family Bovidae. Isolated bovid teeth are typically the most common fossils found in southern Africa and they often constitute the basis for paleoenvironmental reconstructions. Taxonomic identification of fossil bovid teeth, however, is often imprecise and subjective. Using modern teeth with known taxons, machine learning algorithms can be trained to classify fossils. Previous work by Brophy et. al. 2014 uses elliptical Fourier analysis of the form (size and shape) of the outline of the occlusal surface of each tooth as features in a linear discriminant analysis framework. This manuscript expands on that previous work by exploring how different machine learning approaches classify the teeth and testing which technique is best for classification. Five different…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
