On the Fundamentality of Meaning
Brian D. Josephson

TL;DR
The paper argues that meaning may be fundamental and interconnected with matter, proposing a biosemiotic framework that could extend physics to include a more basic level of reality involving simpler sign processes.
Contribution
It introduces the idea that a fundamental level of reality involving sign processes underpins matter and life, integrating biosemiotics into physical theory.
Findings
Biosemiotics offers insights into fundamental reality.
Sign processes may help explain matter and life.
Physics could incorporate sign theory as a foundational aspect.
Abstract
The mainstream view of meaning is that it is emergent, not fundamental, but some have disputed this, asserting that there is a more fundamental level of reality than that addressed by current physical theories, and that matter and meaning are in some way entangled. In this regard there are intriguing parallels between the quantum and biological domains, suggesting that there may be a more fundamental level underlying both. I argue that the organisation of this fundamental level is already to a considerable extent understood by biosemioticians, who have fruitfully integrated Peirce's sign theory into biology; things will happen there resembling what happens with familiar life, but the agencies involved will differ in ways reflecting their fundamentality, in other words they will be less complex, but still have structures complex enough for what they have to do. According to one approach…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhilosophy and History of Science · Origins and Evolution of Life · Quantum Mechanics and Applications
