Quantum versus Classical Online Streaming Algorithms with Advice
Kamil Khadiev, Aliya Khadieva, Mansur Ziatdinov, Dmitry Kravchenko,, Alexander Rivosh, Ramis Yamilov, Ilnaz Mannapov

TL;DR
This paper compares quantum and classical online streaming algorithms, demonstrating quantum advantages in memory-limited settings and showing quantum algorithms outperform classical ones even with advice bits.
Contribution
It introduces problems where quantum online streaming algorithms outperform classical ones with advice, and proves quantum algorithms can surpass classical deterministic algorithms with advice.
Findings
Quantum algorithms outperform classical ones with limited memory.
Quantum algorithms with constant qubits beat classical algorithms with advice.
Quantum advantage persists even with unlimited classical computational power.
Abstract
We consider online algorithms with respect to the competitive ratio. Here, we investigate quantum and classical one-way automata with non-constant size of memory (streaming algorithms) as a model for online algorithms. We construct problems that can be solved by quantum online streaming algorithms better than by classical ones in a case of logarithmic or sublogarithmic size of memory, even if classical online algorithms get advice bits. Furthermore, we show that a quantum online algorithm with a constant number of qubits can be better than any deterministic online algorithm with a constant number of advice bits and unlimited computational power.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Caching and Content Delivery · Cloud Computing and Resource Management
