Indirect unitarity violation entangled with matter effects in reactor antineutrino oscillations
Yu-Feng Li, Zhi-zhong Xing, Jing-yu Zhu

TL;DR
This paper analyzes how tiny deviations from unitarity in the neutrino mixing matrix, caused by the seesaw mechanism, are entangled with matter effects in reactor antineutrino oscillations, concluding that matter effects dominate and unitarity violation has negligible impact.
Contribution
The study provides an analytical approximation of antineutrino oscillation probabilities considering unitarity violation and matter effects, showing their entanglement occurs only at next-to-leading order.
Findings
Unitarity violation effects are smaller than matter effects in oscillation probabilities.
Entanglement between unitarity violation and matter effects appears only at next-to-leading order.
Experimental sensitivities to neutrino parameters remain robust despite unitarity violation.
Abstract
If finite but tiny masses of the three active neutrinos are generated via the canonical seesaw mechanism with three heavy sterile neutrinos, the 3\times 3 Pontecorvo-Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata neutrino mixing matrix V will not be exactly unitary. This kind of indirect unitarity violation can be probed in a precision reactor antineutrino oscillation experiment, but it may be entangled with terrestrial matter effects as both of them are very small. We calculate the probability of \overline{\nu}_e \to \overline{\nu}_e oscillations in a good analytical approximation, and find that, besides the zero-distance effect, the effect of unitarity violation is always smaller than matter effects, and their entanglement does not appear until the next-to-leading-order oscillating terms are taken into account. Given a 20-kiloton JUNO-like liquid scintillator detector, we reaffirm that terrestrial matter…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
