TL;DR
This paper introduces a Bayesian Deep Learning model that effectively quantifies uncertainty in skewed, discrete-continuous data, improving predictions in climate super-resolution tasks and potentially benefiting other fields with extreme value considerations.
Contribution
It presents the first uncertainty quantification model in statistical downscaling that captures both aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties using discrete-continuous likelihoods, especially for skewed data.
Findings
Discrete-continuous models outperform Gaussian in accuracy and calibration.
Lognormal likelihood provides better uncertainty estimates at distribution extremes.
First model to characterize both aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties in statistical downscaling.
Abstract
Deep Learning (DL) methods have been transforming computer vision with innovative adaptations to other domains including climate change. For DL to pervade Science and Engineering (S&E) applications where risk management is a core component, well-characterized uncertainty estimates must accompany predictions. However, S&E observations and model-simulations often follow heavily skewed distributions and are not well modeled with DL approaches, since they usually optimize a Gaussian, or Euclidean, likelihood loss. Recent developments in Bayesian Deep Learning (BDL), which attempts to capture uncertainties from noisy observations, aleatoric, and from unknown model parameters, epistemic, provide us a foundation. Here we present a discrete-continuous BDL model with Gaussian and lognormal likelihoods for uncertainty quantification (UQ). We demonstrate the approach by developing UQ estimates on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
