
TL;DR
This paper analyzes how transparency and timing affect effort levels in sequential contests across various economic scenarios, revealing that full transparency maximizes total effort and that earlier movers have advantages.
Contribution
It introduces a model of sequential contests with effort disclosure, showing how transparency influences total effort and identifying the advantages of early movers.
Findings
Full transparency maximizes total effort.
No transparency minimizes total effort.
Earlier movers have an advantage.
Abstract
I study sequential contests where the efforts of earlier players may be disclosed to later players by nature or by design. The model has a range of applications, including rent seeking, R&D, oligopoly, public goods provision, and tragedy of the commons. I show that information about other players' efforts increases the total effort. Thus, the total effort is maximized with full transparency and minimized with no transparency. I also show that in addition to the first-mover advantage, there is an earlier-mover advantage. Finally, I derive the limits for large contests.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Auction Theory and Applications · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
