Finiteness of Maximal Geodesic Submanifolds in Hyperbolic Hybrids
David Fisher, Jean-Fran\c{c}ois Lafont, Nicholas Miller, Matthew, Stover

TL;DR
This paper proves that many non-arithmetic hyperbolic manifolds, including hybrids, have only finitely many maximal totally geodesic submanifolds, using a combination of algebraic, dynamical, and geometric methods.
Contribution
It establishes finiteness results for maximal geodesic submanifolds in a broad class of non-arithmetic hyperbolic manifolds, extending previous understanding.
Findings
Finiteness of totally geodesic hypersurfaces in hybrid hyperbolic manifolds.
Finiteness of maximal geodesic submanifolds of dimension ≥ 2.
Application of structure theory, dynamics, and negative curvature geometry.
Abstract
We show that large classes of non-arithmetic hyperbolic -manifolds, including the hybrids introduced by Gromov and Piatetski-Shapiro and many of their generalizations, have only finitely many finite-volume immersed totally geodesic hypersurfaces. In higher codimension, we prove finiteness for geodesic submanifolds of dimension at least that are maximal, i.e., not properly contained in a proper geodesic submanifold of the ambient -manifold. The proof is a mix of structure theory for arithmetic groups, dynamics, and geometry in negative curvature.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
