Ions at hydrophobic interfaces
Alexandre P. dos Santos, Yan Levin

TL;DR
This paper investigates the mechanisms of anionic adsorption at hydrophobic interfaces, emphasizing the role of cavitational energy and electrostatic surface potential, and critiques current water models for their inaccuracies.
Contribution
It argues that the electrostatic surface potential in classical water models is artificial and incompatible with polarizable ionic force fields, proposing the development of improved models.
Findings
Polarizable force fields predict strong anionic adsorption due to electrostatic potential.
Experimental surface tension data contradict large adsorption predictions.
Current point charge water models are incompatible with polarizable ionic models.
Abstract
We argue that the kosmotropes remain strongly hydrated in the vicinity of a hydrophobic surface, while the chaotropes lose their hydration shell and can become adsorbed to the interface. The mechanism of adsorption is still a subject of debate. We argue that there are two driving forces for anionic adsorption: the hydrophobic cavitational energy and the interfacial electrostatic surface potential of water. While the cavitational contribution to ionic adsorption is now well accepted, the role of the electrostatic surface potential is much less clear. The difficulty is that even the sign of this potential is a subject of debate, with the ab initio and the classical force field simulations predicting electrostatic surface potentials of opposite sign. In this paper, we will argue that the strong anionic adsorption found in the polarizable force field simulations is the result of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
