Reconciling tensor and scalar observables in G-inflation
H\'ector Ram\'irez, Samuel Passaglia, Hayato Motohashi, Wayne Hu, Olga, Mena

TL;DR
This paper explores how cubic Galileon interactions in G-inflation models can reconcile the tension between the simple quadratic potential and observational constraints on tensor-to-scalar ratio and spectral index, highlighting the importance of transition dynamics.
Contribution
It demonstrates that a rapid transition in Galileon interactions can reconcile observables and introduces an optimized slow-roll approach for accurate predictions of CMB and large scale structure observables.
Findings
A constant Galileon mass scale cannot reconcile observables due to slow interaction decay.
A rapid transition can reconcile observables but introduces a large negative running of the spectral tilt.
Predictions on CMB and large scale structure scales can be accurately made using the optimized slow-roll approach.
Abstract
The simple potential as an inflationary model is coming under increasing tension with limits on the tensor-to-scalar ratio and measurements of the scalar spectral index . Cubic Galileon interactions in the context of the Horndeski action can potentially reconcile the observables. However, we show that this cannot be achieved with only a constant Galileon mass scale because the interactions turn off too slowly, leading also to gradient instabilities after inflation ends. Allowing for a more rapid transition can reconcile the observables but moderately breaks the slow-roll approximation leading to a relatively large and negative running of the tilt that can be of order . We show that the observables on CMB and large scale structure scales can be predicted accurately using the optimized slow-roll approach instead of the traditional slow-roll…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
