The fraction of AGN in major merger galaxies and its luminosity dependence
Anna K. Weigel, Kevin Schawinski, Ezequiel Treister, Benny, Trakhtenbrot, David B. Sanders

TL;DR
This study models the relationship between galaxy mergers and AGN activity at z~0, showing that merger galaxies host a higher fraction of AGN but do not necessarily have higher Eddington ratios, aligning with observed luminosity functions.
Contribution
It introduces a phenomenological model linking galaxy mergers to AGN triggering, quantifying the increased AGN fraction in merger galaxies without assuming higher Eddington ratios.
Findings
AGN fraction in merger galaxies is about 10 times higher than in the general galaxy population.
The increase in AGN fraction with luminosity is explained by the mass dependence of mergers.
Matching observed luminosity functions requires only a modest increase in Eddington ratios among merger hosts.
Abstract
We use a phenomenological model which connects the galaxy and AGN populations to investigate the process of AGN triggering through major galaxy mergers at z~0. The model uses stellar mass functions as input and allows the prediction of AGN luminosity functions based on assumed Eddington ratio distribution functions (ERDFs). We show that the number of AGN hosted by merger galaxies relative to the total number of AGN increases as a function of AGN luminosity. This is due to more massive galaxies being more likely to undergo a merger and does not require the assumption that mergers lead to higher Eddington ratios than secular processes. Our qualitative analysis also shows that to match the observations, the probability of a merger galaxy hosting an AGN and accreting at a given Eddington value has to be increased by a factor ~10 relative to the general AGN population. An additional…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
