$T_2$-limited sensing of static magnetic fields via fast rotation of quantum spins
A. A. Wood, A. G. Aeppli, E. Lilette, Y. Y. Fein, A. Stacey, L. C. L., Hollenberg, R. E. Scholten, A. M. Martin

TL;DR
This paper introduces a method to measure static magnetic fields using rotating quantum spins in diamond, leveraging the longer coherence time $T_2$ to improve sensitivity over traditional static measurements.
Contribution
The authors demonstrate a technique that uses physical rotation of NV centers to convert static fields into oscillating signals, enabling longer measurement times limited by $T_2$ rather than $T_2^*$.
Findings
Measurement duration exceeds traditional Ramsey experiments by over a hundred times.
Potential to achieve DC magnetic field sensitivities comparable to high-performance AC sensors.
Rotation-based scheme upconverts static fields, enhancing measurement precision.
Abstract
Diamond-based quantum magnetometers are more sensitive to oscillating (AC) magnetic fields than static (DC) fields because the crystal impurity-induced ensemble dephasing time , the relevant sensing time for a DC field, is much shorter than the spin coherence time , which determines the sensitivity to AC fields. Here we demonstrate measurement of DC magnetic fields using a physically rotating ensemble of nitrogen-vacancy centres at a precision ultimately limited by rather than . The rotation period of the diamond is comparable to and the angle between the NV axis and the target magnetic field changes as a function of time, thus upconverting the static magnetic field to an oscillating field in the physically rotating frame. Using spin-echo interferometry of the rotating NV centres, we are able to perform measurements for over a hundred times longer compared…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
