Uneven flows: On cosmic bulk flows, local observers, and gravity
Wojciech A. Hellwing (1), Maciej Bilicki (2), Noam I. Libeskind (3), ((1) Warsaw, (2) Leiden, (3) Potsdam)

TL;DR
This study uses N-body simulations to evaluate how survey systematics and observer location affect measurements of cosmic bulk flows and the Cosmic Mach Number, revealing significant biases that can mimic modified gravity signals.
Contribution
It demonstrates the substantial impact of survey and observer location systematics on bulk flow and CMN measurements, emphasizing the need for realistic simulations in future surveys.
Findings
Systematic effects can exceed 10% for bulk flow at scales ≤100h^{-1}Mpc.
Systematics can be larger than 50% for CMN on bigger scales.
Observer location in the Cosmic Web significantly influences local flow measurements.
Abstract
Using N-body simulations we study the impact of various systematic effects on the bulk flow (BF) and the Cosmic Mach Number (CMN). We consider two types of systematics: those related to survey properties and those induced by observer's location in the Universe. In the former category we model sparse sampling, velocity errors, and survey incompleteness. In the latter, we consider Local Group (LG) analogue observers, placed in a specific location within the Cosmic Web, satisfying various observational criteria. We differentiate such LG observers from Copernican ones, who are at random locations. We report strong systematic effects on the measured BF and CMN induced by sparse sampling, velocity errors and radial incompleteness. For BF most of these effects exceed 10\% for scales Mpc. For CMN some of these systematics can be catastrophically large () also on bigger…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
