Alignment Limit in 2HDM: Robustness put to test
Siddhartha Karmakar, Subhendu Rakshit

TL;DR
This paper examines how higher-dimensional operators can obscure the true alignment limit in two-Higgs-doublet models, potentially invalidating the assumption of exact alignment in certain parameter regions.
Contribution
It investigates the impact of bosonic operators on the alignment limit in 2HDM, revealing that these operators can significantly alter the model's parameter space and challenge the notion of exact alignment.
Findings
Bosonic operators can mask the true alignment in 2HDM.
Electroweak constraints limit some operators but others can still modify the parameter space.
Exact alignment can be excluded at 95% CL due to these operators.
Abstract
In a two-Higgs-doublet model (2HDM), at the vicinity of the alignment limit, the extra contributions to the couplings of the SM-like Higgs with other particles can be subdominant to the same coming from the six dimensional operators. In this context, we revisit the alignment limit itself. It is investigated to what extent these operators can mask the actual alignment in a 2HDM. The bosonic operators which rescale the Higgs kinetic terms can lead to substantial change in the parameter space of the model. We find that some other bosonic operators, which are severely constrained from the electroweak precision tests, can also modify the parameter space of 2HDM due to their anomalous momentum structures. A particular kind of Little Higgs model is explored as an example of 2HDM effective field theory in connection with 2HDM alignment. Choosing a suitable benchmark point in a Type-II 2HDM, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
