The orientation of Eta Carinae and the powering mechanism of intermediate luminosity optical transients (ILOTs)
Amit Kashi (1), Noam Soker (2) ((1) Ariel University, (2) Technion)

TL;DR
This paper argues for a specific orientation of Eta Carinae's binary system, suggesting the secondary star is closer to us at periastron, and links this to the energy source of the Great Eruption and similar transients.
Contribution
It challenges recent interpretations of Eta Carinae's orientation, proposing a new model where accretion onto the secondary star powers the Great Eruption and related transients.
Findings
Secondary star is closer to us at periastron.
Mass accreted onto the secondary during the Great Eruption.
Accretion energy accounts for most of the eruption's energy.
Abstract
Contrary to recent claims, we argue that the orientation of the massive binary system Eta Carinae is such that the secondary star is closer to us at periastron passage, and it is on the far side during most of the time of the eccentric orbit. The binary orientation we dispute is based on problematic interpretations of recent observations. Among these observations are the radial velocity of the absorption component of He I P-Cyg lines, of the He II emission line, and of the Br line emitted by clumps close to the binary system. We also base our orientation on observations of asymmetric molecular clumps that were recently observed by ALMA around the binary system, and were claimed to compose a torus with a missing segment. The orientation has implications for the modeling of the binary interaction during the nineteenth century Great Eruption (GE) of Eta Carinae that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
