Explicit size distributions of failure cascades redefine systemic risk on finite networks
Rebekka Burkholz, Hans J. Herrmann, Frank Schweitzer

TL;DR
This paper derives explicit size distributions for failure cascades in finite networks, revealing broad and bimodal outcomes that challenge traditional average-based risk predictions, with implications for real-world network resilience.
Contribution
It provides the first explicit closed-form solutions for the full probability distribution of cascade sizes in finite networks, highlighting the importance of distribution shape over average estimates.
Findings
Cascade size distributions can be broad and bimodal in finite networks.
Traditional mean field approaches may underestimate the risk of large cascades.
Explicit solutions are derived for complete and star network topologies.
Abstract
How big is the risk that a few initial failures of nodes in a network amplify to large cascades that span a substantial share of all nodes? Predicting the final cascade size is critical to ensure the functioning of a system as a whole. Yet, this task is hampered by uncertain or changing parameters and missing information. In infinitely large networks, the average cascade size can often be well estimated by established approaches building on local tree approximations and mean field approximations. Yet, as we demonstrate, in finite networks, this average does not even need to be a likely outcome. Instead, we find broad and even bimodal cascade size distributions. This phenomenon persists for system sizes up to and different cascade models, i.e. it is relevant for most real systems. To show this, we derive explicit closed-form solutions for the full probability distribution of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
