Estimating city-level travel patterns using street imagery: a case study of using Google Street View in Britain
Rahul Goel, Leandro M. T. Garcia, Anna Goodman, Rob Johnson, Rachel, Aldred, Manoradhan Murugesan, Soren Brage, Kavi Bhalla, James Woodcock

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that Google Street View images can effectively predict city-level travel patterns, offering a novel big data approach for urban mobility analysis with promising accuracy.
Contribution
The paper introduces a new method using street imagery to predict travel behaviors at the city level, expanding applications of GSV beyond built environment auditing.
Findings
High correlation between GSV cyclist counts and cycle share (r=0.92).
GSV pedestrian counts moderately correlate with walking participation (r=0.46).
GSV imagery predicts urban travel patterns with good accuracy.
Abstract
Street imagery is a promising big data source providing current and historical images in more than 100 countries. Previous studies used this data to audit built environment features. Here we explore a novel application, using Google Street View (GSV) to predict travel patterns at the city level. We sampled 34 cities in Great Britain. In each city, we accessed GSV images from 1000 random locations from years overlapping with the 2011 Census and the 2011-2013 Active People Survey (APS). We manually annotated images into seven categories of road users. We developed regression models with the counts of images of road users as predictors. Outcomes included Census-reported commute shares of four modes (walking plus public transport, cycling, motorcycle, and car), and APS-reported past-month participation in walking and cycling. In bivariate analyses, we found high correlations between GSV…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
