Tight Lower Bounds for Locally Differentially Private Selection
Jonathan Ullman

TL;DR
This paper establishes tight lower bounds on the sample complexity for non-interactive local differential privacy protocols in linear optimization and the exponential mechanism, highlighting exponential dependence on dimension compared to the central model.
Contribution
It provides the first tight, quantitative lower bounds for local differential privacy protocols in linear optimization, simplifying previous complex proofs.
Findings
Lower bounds are tight up to constant factors.
Local protocols have exponentially worse dependence on dimension.
Results apply to natural linear optimization problems.
Abstract
We prove a tight lower bound (up to constant factors) on the sample complexity of any non-interactive local differentially private protocol for optimizing a linear function over the simplex. This lower bound also implies a tight lower bound (again, up to constant factors) on the sample complexity of any non-interactive local differentially private protocol implementing the exponential mechanism. These results reveal that any local protocol for these problems has exponentially worse dependence on the dimension than corresponding algorithms in the central model. Previously, Kasiviswanathan et al. (FOCS 2008) proved an exponential separation between local and central model algorithms for PAC learning the class of parity functions. In contrast, our lower bound are quantitatively tight, apply to a simple and natural class of linear optimization problems, and our techniques are arguably…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data · Cryptography and Data Security · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
