The First Hours of the GW170817 Kilonova and the Importance of Early Optical and Ultraviolet Observations for Constraining Emission Models
Iair Arcavi

TL;DR
This paper analyzes early optical and ultraviolet data from GW170817's kilonova to evaluate emission models, emphasizing the importance of high-cadence observations within hours after merger for understanding the blue emission source.
Contribution
It compiles and examines multi-wavelength light curves of GW170817 to assess the ability of early data to distinguish between different kilonova emission mechanisms.
Findings
Early optical data support radioactive decay of low-opacity ejecta as the main source.
Ultraviolet data in the first hours are insufficient to conclusively identify the emission mechanism.
High-cadence UV and optical observations shortly after merger are crucial for constraining models.
Abstract
The kilonova associated with GW170817 displayed early blue emission which has been interpreted as a signature of either radioactive decay in low-opacity ejecta, relativistic boosting of radioactive decay in high-velocity ejecta, the cooling of material heated by a wind or by a "cocoon" surrounding a jet, or a combination thereof. Distinguishing between these mechanisms is important for constraining the ejecta components and their parameters, which tie directly into the physics we can learn from these events. I compile published ultraviolet, optical, and infrared light curves of the GW170817 kilonova and examine whether the combined data set can be used to distinguish between early-emission models. The combined optical data show an early rise consistent with radioactive decay of low opacity ejecta as the main emission source, but the subsequent decline is fit well by all models. A lack…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
