Astrophysicists and physicists as creators of ArXiv-based commenting resources for their research communities. An initial survey
Monica Marra

TL;DR
This survey explores the development and impact of ArXiv-based commenting platforms and web 2.0 resources in astrophysics from 2004 to 2016, highlighting their international scope and researcher involvement.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive overview of astrophysics-related web 2.0 resources and commenting platforms, emphasizing researcher-driven creation and the potential for enhanced scientific communication.
Findings
Most resources are UK and US based, but the community is international.
Web 2.0 is currently limited in astrophysics communication.
Researchers play a significant role in shaping communication tools.
Abstract
This paper conveys the outcomes of what results to be the first, though initial, overview of commenting platforms and related 2.0 resources born within and for the astrophysical community (from 2004 to 2016). Experiences were added, mainly in the physics domain, for a total of 22 major items, including four epijournals, and four supplementary resources, thus casting some light onto an unexpected richness and consonance of endeavours. These experiences rest almost entirely on the contents of the database ArXiv, which adds to its merits that of potentially setting the grounds for web 2.0 resources, and research behaviours, to be explored. Most of the experiences retrieved are UK and US based, but the resulting picture is international, as various European countries, China and Australia have been actively involved. Final remarks about creation patterns and outcome of these resources…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
