How far can neural correlations reduce uncertainty? Comparison of Information Transmission Rates for Markov and Bernoulli processes
Agnieszka Pregowska, Ehud Kaplan, Janusz Szczepanski

TL;DR
This paper compares how correlations in neural spike trains affect information transmission in Markov (temporal) versus Bernoulli (rate) processes, showing that correlations cause only small information loss, supporting the efficiency of temporal coding.
Contribution
It provides a quantitative comparison of information loss due to correlations in Markov and Bernoulli neural models, highlighting the practical viability of temporal codes.
Findings
Correlations cause minimal information loss in neural signals.
Temporal codes can effectively replace rate codes in energy-efficient neural communication.
The parameter s critically influences the relation between information transmission rates.
Abstract
The nature of neural codes is central to neuroscience. Do neurons encode information through relatively slow changes in the emission rates of individual spikes (rate code), or by the precise timing of every spike (temporal codes)? Here we compare the loss of information due to correlations for these two possible neural codes. The essence of Shannon's definition of information is to combine information with uncertainty: the higher the uncertainty of a given event, the more information is conveyed by that event. Correlations can reduce uncertainty or the amount of information, but by how much? In this paper we address this question by a direct comparison of the information per symbol conveyed by the words coming from a binary Markov source (temporal codes) with the information per symbol coming from the corresponding Bernoulli source (uncorrelated, rate code source). In a previous paper…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
