The KMOS Cluster Survey (KCS) II - The Effect of Environment on the Structural Properties of Massive Cluster Galaxies at Redshift $1.39 < z <1.61$
Jeffrey C.C. Chan, Alessandra Beifiori, Roberto P. Saglia, J. Trevor, Mendel, John P. Stott, Ralf Bender, Audrey Galametz, David J. Wilman, Michele, Cappellari, Roger L. Davies, Ryan C. W. Houghton, Laura J. Prichard, Ian J., Lewis, Ray Sharples, Michael Wegner

TL;DR
This study investigates how the environment influences the structural evolution of massive passive galaxies at redshifts 1.39 to 1.61, revealing that cluster galaxies are larger and exhibit different color gradients compared to field galaxies, supporting minor mergers as a key process.
Contribution
It provides new insights into the environmental effects on galaxy sizes and stellar population gradients at high redshift, emphasizing the role of minor mergers during cluster assembly.
Findings
Cluster galaxies are 2-3 times smaller than local counterparts.
Median size of cluster galaxies is 24% larger than field galaxies.
Color gradients are twice as steep as local values, indicating age and metallicity variations.
Abstract
We present results on the structural properties of massive passive galaxies in three clusters at from the KMOS Cluster Survey. We measure light-weighted and mass-weighted sizes from optical and near-infrared Hubble Space Telescope imaging and spatially resolved stellar mass maps. The rest-frame -band sizes of these galaxies are a factor of smaller than their local counterparts. The slopes of the relation between the stellar mass and the light-weighted size are consistent with recent studies in clusters and the field. Their mass-weighted sizes are smaller than the rest frame -band sizes, with an average mass-weighted to light-weighted size ratio that varies between and among the clusters. We find that the median light-weighted size of the passive galaxies in the two more evolved clusters is larger than for field galaxies,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
