Inverse regression for ridge recovery II: Numerics
Andrew Glaws, Paul G. Constantine, R. Dennis Cook

TL;DR
This paper examines the numerical aspects of applying inverse regression methods, specifically SIR and SAVE, for ridge recovery in noiseless deterministic functions, providing detailed eigenvalue analysis and practical demonstrations.
Contribution
It offers a detailed numerical analysis of SIR and SAVE methods for ridge recovery, highlighting subtleties and demonstrating their effectiveness on test problems.
Findings
Eigenvalue analysis reveals key properties of the methods.
SIR and SAVE successfully recover ridge subspaces in tests.
Numerical subtleties impact the accuracy of ridge recovery.
Abstract
We investigate the application of sufficient dimension reduction (SDR) to a noiseless data set derived from a deterministic function of several variables. In this context, SDR provides a framework for ridge recovery. In this second part, we explore the numerical subtleties associated with using two inverse regression methods---sliced inverse regression (SIR) and sliced average variance estimation (SAVE)---for ridge recovery. This includes a detailed numerical analysis of the eigenvalues of the resulting matrices and the subspaces spanned by their columns. After this analysis, we demonstrate the methods on several numerical test problems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques · Numerical methods in inverse problems · Statistical and numerical algorithms
