$H_0$ from cosmic chronometers and Type Ia supernovae, with Gaussian Processes and the novel Weighted Polynomial Regression method
Adri\`a G\'omez-Valent, Luca Amendola

TL;DR
This study refines the measurement of the Hubble constant $H_0$ using cosmic chronometers, Type Ia supernovae data, Gaussian processes, and a new weighted polynomial regression method, finding results consistent with lower $H_0$ values and in tension with local measurements.
Contribution
It introduces a novel Weighted Polynomial Regression method for reconstructing $H(z)$ and provides an extended Gaussian processes analysis incorporating comprehensive supernova data.
Findings
$H_0$ from combined data: 67.06±1.68 km/s/Mpc
Weighted Polynomial Regression yields $H_0$=68.90±1.96 km/s/Mpc
Results are consistent with lower $H_0$ values and show tension with HST measurements
Abstract
In this paper we present new constraints on the Hubble parameter using: (i) the available data on obtained from cosmic chronometers (CCH); (ii) the Hubble rate data points extracted from the supernovae of Type Ia (SnIa) of the Pantheon compilation and the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) CANDELS and CLASH Multy-Cycle Treasury (MCT) programs; and (iii) the local HST measurement of provided by Riess et al. (2018), km/s/Mpc. Various determinations of using the Gaussian processes (GPs) method and the most updated list of CCH data have been recently provided by Yu, Ratra and Wang (2018). Using the Gaussian kernel they find km/s/Mpc. Here we extend their analysis to also include the most released and complete set of SnIa data, which allows us to reduce the uncertainty by a factor with respect to the result…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
