A Method for Discovering and Extracting Author Contributions Information from Scientific Biomedical Publications

TL;DR

This paper presents a method to automatically identify and extract author contribution roles from biomedical publications' 'Authors' contributions' sections using clustering, OpenIE, and supervised learning, aiding in assessment of scientific achievements.

Contribution

It introduces a novel approach combining clustering, OpenIE, and supervised learning to automatically extract author roles from natural language in biomedical papers.

Findings

Achieved 0.71 precision in role extraction

Discovered common roles like experimenting, analysis, and study design

Built a training set for supervised extraction from semi-automated clustering

Abstract

Creating scientific publications is a complex process, typically composed of a number of different activities, such as designing the experiments, data preparation, programming software and writing and editing the manuscript. The information about the contributions of individual authors of a paper is important in the context of assessing authors' scientific achievements. Some publications in biomedical disciplines contain a description of authors' roles in the form of a short section written in natural language, typically entitled "Authors' contributions". In this paper, we present an analysis of roles commonly appearing in the content of these sections, and propose an algorithm for automatic extraction of authors' roles from natural language text in scientific publications. During the first part of the study, we used clustering techniques, as well as Open Information Extraction (OpenIE), to semi-automatically discover the most popular roles within a corpus of 2,000 contributions sections obtained from PubMed Central resources. The roles discovered by our approach include: experimenting (1,743 instances, 17% of the entire role set within the corpus), analysis (1,343, 16%), study design (1,132, 13%), interpretation (879, 10%), conceptualization (865, 10%), paper reading (823, 10%), paper writing (724, 8%), paper review (501, 6%), paper drafting (351, 4%), coordination (319, 4%), data collection (76, 1%), paper review (41, 0.5%) and literature review (41, 0.5%). Discovered roles were then used to automatically build a training set for the supervised role extractor, based on Naive Bayes algorithm. According to the evaluation we performed, the proposed role extraction algorithm is able to extract the roles from the text with precision 0.71, recall 0.49 and F1 0.58.