Stability of the Euler Resting N-Body Relative Equlilbria
D.J. Scheeres

TL;DR
This paper investigates the stability of linear arrangements of equal-sized gravitating spheres in rotation, revealing that such configurations are only stable for up to five bodies, thus limiting the aspect ratio of rubble pile shapes.
Contribution
It generalizes the Euler Resting configuration stability analysis to N bodies, establishing a maximum of five for stability and implications for asteroid shapes.
Findings
Euler Resting configuration stable only up to 5 bodies
Configurations with 6 or more bodies are inherently unstable
Limits the aspect ratio of rubble pile bodies to 5:1
Abstract
The stability of a system of equal sized mutually gravitating spheres resting on each other in a straight line and rotating in inertial space is considered. This is a generalization of the "Euler Resting" configurations previously analyzed in the finite density 3 and 4 body problems. Specific questions for the general case are how rapidly the system must spin for the configuration to stabilize, how rapidly it can spin before the components separate from each other, and how these results change as a function of . This paper shows that the Euler Resting configuration can only be stable for up to 5 bodies, and that for 6 or more bodies the configuration can never be stable. This places an ideal limit of 5:1 on the aspect ratio of a rubble pile body's shape.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstro and Planetary Science · Geophysics and Gravity Measurements · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
