Resolving the Disc-Halo Degeneracy I: A Look at NGC 628
S. Aniyan, K. C. Freeman, M. Arnaboldi, O. E. Gerhard, L. Coccato, M., Fabricius, K. Kuijken, M. Merrifield, A. A. Ponomareva

TL;DR
This paper investigates the disc-halo degeneracy in galaxy rotation curves, demonstrating that previous estimates of disc mass density are underestimated by not accounting for stellar population differences, affecting the maximality assessment.
Contribution
It introduces a method to distinguish stellar populations in velocity dispersion measurements, improving disc mass density estimates in NGC 628.
Findings
Previous studies underestimate disc surface mass density by a factor of ~2.
Accounting for stellar population differences can change the perceived maximality of the disc.
The method refines the understanding of galaxy mass distribution and dark matter contribution.
Abstract
The decomposition of the rotation curve of galaxies into contribution from the disc and dark halo remains uncertain and depends on the adopted mass to light ratio (M/L) of the disc. Given the vertical velocity dispersion of stars and disc scale height, the disc surface mass density and hence the M/L can be estimated. We address a conceptual problem with previous measurements of the scale height and dispersion. When using this method, the dispersion and scale height must refer to the same population of stars. The scale height is obtained from near-IR studies of edge-on galaxies and is weighted towards older kinematically hotter stars, whereas the dispersion obtained from integrated light in the optical bands includes stars of all ages. We aim to extract the dispersion for the hotter stars, so that it can then be used with the correct scale height to obtain the disc surface mass density.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
