Observational constraints on the physical nature of submillimetre source multiplicity: chance projections are common
Christopher C. Hayward, Scott C. Chapman, Charles C. Steidel, Anneya, Golob, Caitlin M. Casey, Daniel J. B. Smith, Adi Zitrin, Andrew W. Blain,, Malcolm N. Bremer, Chian-Chou Chen, Kristen E. K. Coppin, Duncan Farrah,, Eduardo Ibar, Micha{\l} J. Micha{\l}owski, Marcin Sawicki

TL;DR
This study uses spectroscopic data to determine whether multiple submillimetre galaxies observed as single sources are physically related or chance alignments, revealing both scenarios are common and challenging previous assumptions.
Contribution
First statistical analysis to distinguish physical association from chance projection in submm source multiplicity using spectroscopic redshifts.
Findings
Approximately 43% of sources are physically associated.
About 57% of sources include at least one unassociated component.
Both physical mergers and chance projections significantly contribute to observed submm sources.
Abstract
Interferometric observations have demonstrated that a significant fraction of single-dish submillimetre (submm) sources are blends of multiple submm galaxies (SMGs), but the nature of this multiplicity, i.e. whether the galaxies are physically associated or chance projections, has not been determined. We performed spectroscopy of 11 SMGs in six multi-component submm sources, obtaining spectroscopic redshifts for nine of them. For an additional two component SMGs, we detected continuum emission but no obvious features. We supplement our observed sources with four sources from the literature. This sample allows us to statistically constrain the physical nature of single-dish submm source multiplicity for the first time. In three [3/7, or 43 (-33/+39) per cent at 95% confidence] of the single-dish sources for which the nature of the blending is unambiguous, the components for which…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
