EDIBLES II. On the detectability of C60+ bands
R. Lallement, N.L.J. Cox, J. Cami, J. Smoker, A. Fahrang, M., Elyajouri, M.A. Cordiner, H. Linnartz, K.T. Smith, P. Ehrenfreund, B. Foing

TL;DR
This paper investigates the detectability of C60+ bands in astronomical spectra, addressing previous claims and counterarguments by analyzing high-quality data and refining spectral models.
Contribution
It provides a detailed reanalysis of C60+ diffuse interstellar bands, clarifying previous controversies and improving detection methods using high-resolution spectra.
Findings
No wavelength shift of the 9632Å band towards HD 37022.
The ratio variability of the 9632Å and 9577Å bands is likely overestimated.
The weak 9428Å band can still be present in spectra, contrary to previous claims.
Abstract
Gas phase spectroscopic laboratory experiments for the buckminsterfullerene cation C60+ resulted in accurate rest wavelengths for five C60+ transitions that have been compared with diffuse interstellar bands (DIBs) in the near infra-red. Detecting these in astronomical spectra is difficult due to the strong contamination of ground-based spectra by atmospheric water vapor, to the presence of weak and shallow stellar lines and/or blending with other weak DIBs. The detection of the two strong bands has been claimed by several teams, and the three additional and weaker bands have been detected in a few sources. Certain recent papers have argued against the identification of C60+ based on spectral analyses claiming (i) a large variation in the ratio between the equivalent widths of the 9632 and 9577\AA\: bands, (ii) a large redshift of the 9632\AA\: band for the Orion star HD 37022, and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
