On the accuracy of retinal protonated Schiff base models
Jae Woo Park, Toru Shiozaki

TL;DR
This study compares different computational methods for modeling the molecular geometries of retinal protonated Schiff base models, revealing that advanced XMS-CASPT2 calculations suggest certain isomerization pathways are thermally inaccessible, unlike traditional SA-CASSCF results.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of XMS-CASPT2 and SA-CASSCF methods for retinal models, highlighting the importance of dynamical electron correlation in predicting conical intersection geometries.
Findings
XMS-CASPT2 indicates the 13-14 isomerization conical intersection is thermally inaccessible.
Differences between methods are due to stabilization of charge transfer states by dynamical correlation.
Active space, basis set, and state averaging choices significantly affect results.
Abstract
We investigate the molecular geometries of the ground state and the minimal energy conical intersections (MECIs) between the ground and first excited states of the models for the retinal protonated Schiff base in the gas phase using the extended multistate complete active space second-order perturbation theory (XMS-CASPT2). The biggest model in this work is the rhodopsin chromophore truncated between the {\epsilon} and {\delta} carbon atoms, which consists of 54 atoms and 12-orbital {\pi} conjugation. The results are compared with those obtained by the state-averaged complete active space self-consistent field (SA-CASSCF). The XMS-CASPT2 results suggest that the minimum energy conical intersection associated with the so-called 13-14 isomerization is thermally inaccessible, which is in contrast to the SA-CASSCF results. The differences between the geometries of the conical intersections…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
