The Supersymmetric WKB Formalism is Not Exact for All Additive Shape Invariant Potentials
Jonathan Bougie, Asim Gangopadhyaya, and Constantin Rasinariu

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the supersymmetric WKB (SWKB) method, previously believed to be exact for all additive shape invariant potentials, is not universally accurate by providing a counterexample.
Contribution
The paper presents a specific additive shape invariant potential where the SWKB method fails, challenging the prior assumption of its universal exactness.
Findings
SWKB is not exact for all additive shape invariant potentials
A concrete counterexample of failure is provided
Questions the universality of SWKB's exactness in supersymmetric quantum mechanics
Abstract
Following the verification of the conjecture made by Comtet, Bandrauk and Campbell that the supersymmetry-inspired semiclassical method known as SWKB is exact for the conventional additive shape invariant potentials, it was widely believed that SWKB yields exact results for all additive shape invariant potentials. In this paper we present a concrete example of an additive shape invariant potential for which the SWKB method fails to produce exact results.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
