Hardy's paradox according to non-classical semantics
Arkady Bolotin

TL;DR
This paper explores Hardy's paradox through various non-classical semantics, demonstrating that these approaches can resolve the paradox in quantum mechanics.
Contribution
It introduces and analyzes multiple non-classical semantic frameworks for resolving Hardy's paradox in quantum theory.
Findings
Non-classical semantics can resolve Hardy's paradox
Partial, many-valued, and weak value semantics are effective
Different semantic approaches offer new insights into quantum paradoxes
Abstract
In the paper, using the language of spin-half particles, Hardy's paradox is examined within different semantics: a partial one, a many-valued one, and one defined as a set of weak values of projection operators. As it is shown in this paper, any of such non-classical semantics can resolve Hardy's paradox.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
