Indistinguishable binomial decision tree of 3-SAT: Proof of class P is a proper subset of class NP
Keum-Bae Cho

TL;DR
This paper claims to prove that P is a proper subset of NP by constructing an indistinguishable binomial decision tree within 3-SAT instances, demonstrating no polynomial-time solution exists for NP-complete problems.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of an indistinguishable binomial decision tree in 3-SAT, providing a novel proof that P ≠ NP.
Findings
Constructed a binomial decision tree within 3-SAT instances.
Showed the exponential complexity of paths in the decision tree.
Concluded P is a proper subset of NP based on the decision tree analysis.
Abstract
This paper solves a long standing open problem of whether NP-complete problems could be solved in polynomial time on a deterministic Turing machine by showing that the indistinguishable binomial decision tree can be formed in a 3-SAT instance. This paper describes how to construct the decision tree and explains why 3-SAT has no polynomial-time algorithm when the decision tree is formed in the 3-SAT instance. The indistinguishable binomial decision tree consists of polynomial numbers of nodes containing an indistinguishable variable pair but generates exponentially many paths connecting the clauses to be used for sequences of resolution steps. The number of paths starting from the root node and arriving at a child node forms a binomial coefficient. In addition, each path has an indistinguishable property from one another. Due to the exponential number of paths and their…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplexity and Algorithms in Graphs · Advanced Graph Theory Research · semigroups and automata theory
