Heterogeneity effects in power-grid network models
G\'eza \'Odor, B\'alint Hartmann

TL;DR
This study compares phase synchronization in power-grid and lattice models, revealing finite size effects, hysteresis, and avalanche dynamics, with implications for understanding stability and disorder in real power networks.
Contribution
It demonstrates that power-grid networks exhibit first-order synchronization transitions with no true phase transition in the thermodynamic limit, highlighting the effects of network heterogeneity.
Findings
Synchronization transitions are of first order with hysteresis.
No true phase transition in the thermodynamic limit for power grids.
Avalanche durations follow power-law distributions, indicating rare region effects.
Abstract
We have compared the phase synchronization transition of the second order Kuramoto model on 2D lattices and on large, synthetic power grid networks, generated from real data. The latter are weighted, hierarchical modular networks. Due to the inertia the synchronization transitions are of first order type, characterized by fast relaxation and hysteresis by varying the global coupling parameter K. Finite size scaling analysis shows that there is no real phase transition in the thermodynamic limit, unlike in the mean-field model. The order parameter and its fluctuations depend on the network size without any real singular behavior. In case of power grids the phase synchronization breaks down at lower global couplings, than in case of 2D lattices of the same sizes, but the hysteresis is much narrower or negligible due to the low connectivity of the graphs. The temporal behavior of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
