Quantum Mechanics and Perspectivalism
Dennis Dieks

TL;DR
This paper advocates for a perspectival interpretation of quantum mechanics, suggesting that properties of quantum systems depend on their relations to other systems, which helps address issues with collapse theories and relativity.
Contribution
It introduces a perspectival framework for quantum objects, challenging traditional monadic property views and resolving conflicts in single-world and relativistic interpretations.
Findings
Perspectivalism explains quantum properties as relational rather than intrinsic.
It avoids the need for wave function collapse in explaining interference.
The approach addresses conflicts in relativistic quantum theories.
Abstract
Experimental evidene of the last decades has made the status of "collapses of the wave function" even more shaky than it already was on conceptual grounds: interference effects turn out to be detectable even when collapses are typically expected to occur. Non-collapse interpretations should consequently be taken seriously. In this paper we argue that such interpretations suggest a perspectivalism according to which quantum objects are not characterized by monadic properties, but by relations to other systems. Accordingly, physical systems may possess different properties with respect to different "reference systems". We discuss some of the relevant arguments, and argue that perspectivalism both evades recent arguments that single-world interpretations are inconsistent and eliminates the need for a privileged rest frame in the relativistic case.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Biofield Effects and Biophysics
