Structural distortion behind the nematic superconductivity in Sr$_x$Bi$_2$Se$_3$
A.Yu. Kuntsevich, M.A. Bryzgalov, V.A. Prudkoglyad, V.P. Martovitskii,, Yu.G. Selivanov, E.G. Chizhevskii

TL;DR
This study reveals that small structural distortions in Sr$_x$Bi$_2$Se$_3$ crystals are correlated with the observed nematic superconductivity, suggesting structural factors significantly influence the nematic behavior.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that structural distortions, rather than purely electronic effects, play a key role in the nematic superconductivity of Sr$_x$Bi$_2$Se$_3$, supported by detailed diffraction and transport measurements.
Findings
Structural distortions correlate with nematic superconductivity direction.
Small elongations (~0.02%) influence superconducting anisotropy.
Structural factors significantly contribute to nematic behavior.
Abstract
An archetypical layered topological insulator BiSe becomes superconductive upon doping with Sr, Nb or Cu. Superconducting properties of these materials in the presence of in-plane magnetic field demonstrate spontaneous symmetry breaking: 180-rotation symmetry of superconductivity versus 120-rotation symmetry of the crystal. Such behavior brilliantly confirms nematic topological superconductivity. To what extent this nematicity is due to superconducting pairing in these materials, rather than due to crystal structure distortions? This question remained unanswered, because so far no visible deviations from the 3-fold crystal symmetry were resolved in these materials. To address this question we grow high quality single crystals of SrBiSe, perform detailed X-ray diffraction and magnetotransport studies and reveal that the observed superconducting…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
