A Comparison of SC-FDE and UW DFT-s-OFDM for Millimeter Wave Communications
Alphan Sahin, Rui Yang, Frank La Sita, Robert L. Olesen

TL;DR
This paper compares SC-FDE and UW DFT-s-OFDM waveforms for millimeter wave communications, showing that UW DFT-s-OFDM offers better throughput and compatibility with existing standards through detailed analysis and simulations.
Contribution
It provides an explicit DFT-based comparison of SC-FDE and UW DFT-s-OFDM waveforms and demonstrates performance improvements and interoperability benefits.
Findings
UW DFT-s-OFDM achieves 1 dB higher peak throughput.
Replacing SC with UW DFT-s-OFDM improves performance in multipath channels.
Cross-link evaluations show near-compatible decoding with slight SNR loss.
Abstract
In this study, we compare the single-carrier (SC) waveform adopted in IEEE 802.11ad and unique word discrete Fourier transform spread orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (UW DFT-s-OFDM) waveform. We provide equivalent representations of up-sampling and down-sampling operations of the SC waveform by using discrete Fourier transform (DFT) and inverse DFT to enable explicit comparison of these two similar waveforms. By using this representation, we discuss why the IEEE 802.11ad SC waveform can cause suboptimal performance in multipath channel and discuss how to improve it with UW DFT-s-OFDM. With comprehensive link-level simulations, we show that replacing the 802.11ad SC waveform with UW DFT-spread OFDM can result in 1 dB gain in peak throughput without affecting the IEEE 802.11ad packet structure. We also evaluate the cross links where the transmitter is UW-DFT-s-OFDM and the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
