Oracle Separations for Quantum Statistical Zero-Knowledge
Sanketh Menda, John Watrous

TL;DR
This paper explores the limitations of quantum statistical zero-knowledge proof systems by establishing oracle-based separations, demonstrating they cannot encompass certain complexity classes under relativized settings.
Contribution
It provides the first oracle separations showing quantum statistical zero-knowledge does not contain UP or coUP, advancing understanding of quantum proof system boundaries.
Findings
Quantum statistical zero-knowledge does not contain UP relative to some oracle.
Quantum statistical zero-knowledge does not contain UP relative to a random oracle.
The proofs use bounds on output state discrimination for relativized quantum circuits.
Abstract
This paper investigates the power of quantum statistical zero knowledge interactive proof systems in the relativized setting. We prove the existence of an oracle relative to which quantum statistical zero-knowledge does not contain UP intersect coUP, and we prove that quantum statistical zero knowledge does not contain UP relative to a random oracle with probability 1. Our proofs of these statements rely on a bound on output state discrimination for relativized quantum circuits based on the quantum adversary method of Ambainis, following a technique similar to one used by Ben-David and Kothari to prove limitations on a query complexity variant of quantum statistical zero-knowledge.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCryptography and Data Security · Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
