Received Signal Strength for Randomly Distributed Molecular Nanonodes
Rafay Iqbal Ansari, Chrysostomos Chrysostomou, Taqwa Saeed, Marios, Lestas, Andreas Pitsillides

TL;DR
This paper models the received signal strength between randomly distributed nanonodes in a circular area using molecular communication, deriving probability distributions for free diffusion and diffusion with drift to aid in understanding communication reliability.
Contribution
It introduces a stochastic process model for received signal strength in molecular nanonode communication, deriving its probability density and cumulative distribution functions for the first time.
Findings
Derived the probability density function of received signal strength.
Obtained the cumulative distribution function for free diffusion.
Laid groundwork for analyzing signal-to-noise ratio in molecular communication.
Abstract
We consider nanonodes randomly distributed in a circular area and characterize the received signal strength when a pair of these nodes employ molecular communication. Two communication methods are investigated, namely free diffusion and diffusion with drift. Since the nodes are randomly distributed, the distance between them can be represented as a random variable, which results in a stochastic process representation of the received signal strength. We derive the probability density function of this process for both molecular communication methods. Specifically for the case of free diffusion we also derive the cumulative distribution function, which can be used to derive transmission success probabilities. The presented work constitutes a first step towards the characterization of the signal to noise ratio in the considered setting for a number of molecular communication methods.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
