Making Sense of the Many Worlds Interpretation
Stephen Boughn

TL;DR
This paper provides an experimental physicist's perspective on the Many Worlds Interpretation of quantum mechanics, discussing its history, significance, and ongoing debates within physics and philosophy.
Contribution
It offers a pragmatic, experimentalist viewpoint on the Many Worlds Interpretation, highlighting its relevance and the importance of empirical insights in understanding quantum foundations.
Findings
Historical overview of the Many Worlds Interpretation
Discussion on the significance of the interpretation in physics and philosophy
Advocacy for experimental perspectives in interpreting quantum mechanics
Abstract
It has been 61 years since Hugh Everett III's PhD dissertation, {\it On the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics}, was submitted to the Princeton University Physics Department. After more than a decade of relative obscurity it was resurrected by Bryce DeWitt as {\it The Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics} and since then has become an active topic of discussion, reinterpretation, and modification, especially among philosophers of science, quantum cosmologists, and advocates of quantum decoherence and quantum computing. Many of these analyses are quite sophisticated and considered to be important contributions to physics and philosophy. I am primarily an experimental physicist and my pragmatic ruminations on the subject might viewed with some suspicion. Indeed, Bohr's pragmatic {\it Copenhagen Interpretation} is often disparaged by this same cohort. Still, I think that my…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Philosophy and History of Science · Relativity and Gravitational Theory
