The JCMT Gould Belt Survey: A First Look at the Auriga-California Molecular Cloud with SCUBA-2
H. Broekhoven-Fiene, B.C. Matthews, P. Harvey, H. Kirk, M. Chen, M.J., Currie, K. Pattle, J. Lane, J. Buckle, J. Di Francesco, E. Drabek-Maunder, D., Johnstone, D.S. Berry, M. Fich, J. Hatchell, T. Jenness, J.C. Mottram, D., Nutter, J.E. Pineda, C. Quinn, C. Salji, S. Tisi

TL;DR
This study uses SCUBA-2 observations to identify and analyze protostellar objects in the Auriga-California molecular cloud, comparing its star formation activity to the Orion A cloud and providing insights into star formation efficiency.
Contribution
First detailed submillimeter survey of Auriga-Cal, identifying candidate protostars and comparing star formation rates with Orion A.
Findings
Identified 59 candidate protostars, with 24 confirmed by existing catalogs.
Auriga-Cal has fewer star-forming objects than Orion A, indicating lower star formation efficiency.
Star formation rates in Auriga-Cal are consistent over the Class II lifetime, suggesting persistent lower activity.
Abstract
We present 850 and 450 micron observations of the dense regions within the Auriga-California molecular cloud using SCUBA-2 as part of the JCMT Gould Belt Legacy Survey to identify candidate protostellar objects, measure the masses of their circumstellar material (disk and envelope), and compare the star formation to that in the Orion A molecular cloud. We identify 59 candidate protostars based on the presence of compact submillimeter emission, complementing these observations with existing Herschel/SPIRE maps. Of our candidate protostars, 24 are associated with young stellar objects (YSOs) in the Spitzer and Herschel/PACS catalogs of 166 and 60 YSOs, respectively (177 unique), confirming their protostellar nature. The remaining 35 candidate protostars are in regions, particularly around LkHalpha 101, where the background cloud emission is too bright to verify or rule out the presence of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
